Water Health Check Report

Los Angeles, CA

Los Angeles Dept. Of Water & Power (Ladwp) · Surface water source · Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Colorado River via CRA; Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta via State Water Project); local groundwater (San Fernando Valley Basin)

48

Concerning

1 above EPA limit
6 above EWG guideline
Perchlorate MCL updated 2026—compliance transition in progress

Score methodology →
EPA · CA1910067UCMR5 PFAS data included3,870,000 people servedLast updated Mar 2026
State monitoring · March 2026EPA UCMR5 · December 2023

Concerning — with 7 concerns

Los Angeles Dept. Of Water & Power (Ladwp) has 1 contaminant above EPA legal limits and 6 above EWG health guidelines. No PFAS detected in UCMR5 sampling

No PFAS detected in UCMR5 samplingLead levels within limits at treatment plant

Personalise for your household

Select all that apply

PFAS—25 compounds tested, none detected

EPA UCMR5 monitoring found no PFAS above the minimum reporting level in Los Angeles's water supply. This is a meaningful result: PFAS have been detected in roughly half of all tested US public water systems.

Source: EPA UCMR5 (2023–2025) · 25 compounds tested including all regulated PFAS

Source water—blended supply

Los Angeles Dept. Of Water & Power (Ladwp) blends surface water and local groundwater. The figures above reflect utility-wide averages across all distribution zones. Water chemistry—particularly hardness, nitrates, and naturally occurring minerals—can vary meaningfully by district and season depending on the blend ratio. If your neighbourhood draws primarily from the groundwater portion, contaminant levels for minerals and agricultural compounds may differ from the utility average shown here.

Source: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Colorado River via CRA; Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta via State Water Project); local groundwater (San Fernando Valley Basin)

Contaminants tested

40 total · 6 above EWG guideline
ContaminantLevelStatus
Perchlorate

CAS 14797-73-0

0.81 ppb
Above EPA limit
Arsenic

CAS 7440-38-2

3.7 ppb
Above guideline
21.5 ppb
Above guideline
7.3 ppb
Above guideline
1.2 ppb
Above guideline
Nitrate

CAS 14797-55-8

1.3 ppm
Above guideline
Manganese

CAS 7439-96-5

144.7 ppb
Above guideline
Uranium

CAS 7440-61-1

0.15 ppb
Within limits
Selenium

CAS 7782-49-2

1.0 ppb
Within limits
Mercury (inorganic)

CAS 7439-97-6

< 0.01 ppb
Within limits
Fluoride

CAS 16984-48-8

0.69 ppm
Within limits
Barium

CAS 7440-39-3

0.05 ppm
Within limits
Copper

CAS 7440-50-8

0.01 ppm
Within limits
Lithium

CAS 7439-93-2

58.3 ppb
Within limits
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
Lead

CAS 7439-92-1

ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
ND
Not detected
LegendWithin limitsAbove EWG guidelineAbove EPA limitNot detectedSource: EPA SDWIS · UCMR5 · EWG Health Guidelines

Filter recommendation

7 contaminants above guidelines. Here's what removes them.

A guided 4-question flow matches you to the right filter for your setup, budget, and household.

Get filter match →
Water wellness · Drawn Health

Want to go further than filtration?

Your report shows 7 contaminants above health guidelines. A specialist at Drawn can give you an expert read on your specific profile — what to prioritise, which filters actually address it, and what optimisation looks like for your household.

What a consultation covers

  • Your contaminant profile explained in plain English
  • Filter recommendations matched to what's actually in your water
  • Optimisation options for households ready for that conversation
Talk to a specialist at Drawn

20 min · Free · No obligation

Data sources

State monitoring data·March 2026·Updated monthly
EPA UCMR5 (PFAS + lithium)·December 2023·One-time programme 2023–2025

Status flags compare detected levels against both EPA legal limits and EWG health-based guidelines—which are stricter and science-derived, independent of political feasibility.